<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Republican Congressional Committee &#187; Kayla Sulzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nrcc.org/author/ksulzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nrcc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: Is Obama Losing His Credibility?</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=42476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama’s Credibility: Losing it As the scandals continue to mount, the Obama Administration continues to be under fire from all sides of the spectrum.  It’s a matter of credibility, and according to the New York Times, the President is losing it.1  What’s worse, Americans seem to agree. The latest from NBC/WSJ asked respondents to give <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/">Polling Memo: Is Obama Losing His Credibility?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Obama’s Credibility: Losing it</b></p>
<p>As the scandals continue to mount, the Obama Administration continues to be under fire from all sides of the spectrum.  It’s a matter of credibility, and according to the <i>New York Times</i>, the President is losing it.<sup>1</sup>  What’s worse, Americans seem to agree.</p>
<p>The latest from <i><a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/11/18885926-nbc-newswsj-poll-affirmative-action-support-at-historic-low?lite">NBC/WSJ</a></i> asked respondents to give Obama a 1-5 rating on being “honest and straight forward.”  Let’s take a look at intensity, the 1s and 5s—1s being “very poor” and 5s being “very good.”  Only <b>23%</b> gave the President a &#8220;very good&#8221; rating, down from <b>28%</b> in January.  On the opposite end, <b>30%</b> gave him a “very poor” rating, up from <b>24%</b> six months ago.  That’s a net <b>11 point</b> swing against Obama since the start of his second term.</p>
<p>And, get this.</p>
<p>In January 2009, when President Obama was first sworn in as Commander –in –Chief, a striking <b>41%</b> gave him a “very good” rating in terms of being honest and straightforward, while a mere <b>8%</b> said the opposite.  To put that in perspective, compared to today, when contemplating the President’s honesty, Obama has seen a net negative movement of <b>40 points</b> since he first took office.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/obama-credibility_final/" rel="attachment wp-att-42481"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-42481" alt="Obama-Credibility_FINAL" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Obama-Credibility_FINAL.png" width="752" height="482" /></a></center>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Hart/McInturff for NBC/WSJ</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/30-6/2/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,000 Adults; MoE ±3.1%</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/11/18885926-nbc-newswsj-poll-affirmative-action-support-at-historic-low?lite">http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/11/18885926-nbc-newswsj-poll-affirmative-action-support-at-historic-low?lite</a></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup>1 </sup><i><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.html</a></i></span></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Since the start of his 2nd term, numbers show an 11 pt swing against Obama on being “honest &amp; straightforward.” <a title="http://goo.gl/tLIIN" href="http://t.co/QvQAdyk8kM">goo.gl/tLIIN</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>— Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/345260726304268288">June 13, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/">Polling Memo: Is Obama Losing His Credibility?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/13/polling-memo-is-obama-losing-his-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: An ObamaCare Recap</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=42298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Living Under ObamaCare: New Record Lows When it comes to ObamaCare, it seems like things just keep getting worse for the President. Let’s recap. At the end of April, 72% of voters said they were worried the cost of their healthcare insurance would go up under Obamacare.  Another 57% said they were worried they wouldn’t <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/">Polling Memo: An ObamaCare Recap</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/obamacare-recap_small_final/" rel="attachment wp-att-42312"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-42312" alt="ObamaCare-Recap_small_final" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ObamaCare-Recap_small_final.png" width="754" height="752" /></a></center></p>
<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Living Under ObamaCare: New Record Lows</b></p>
<p>When it comes to ObamaCare, it seems like things just keep getting worse for the President.</p>
<p>Let’s recap.</p>
<p>At the end of April, <b><a href="http://d15o3uej81snwq.cloudfront.net/assets/National-YG-Network-Policy-5-2-13-Presentation-for-RELEASE1.pdf">72% of voters said</a></b> they were worried the cost of their healthcare insurance would go up under Obamacare.  Another <b><a href="http://d15o3uej81snwq.cloudfront.net/assets/National-YG-Network-Policy-5-2-13-Presentation-for-RELEASE1.pdf">57% said</a></b> they were worried they wouldn’t be able to keep their current healthcare plan.</p>
<p>Just in case Obama wasn’t taking it personal, <i><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/04/08/rel4a.pdf">CNN’s</a> </i> latest Presidential approval rating for healthcare policy had Obama at <b>54%</b> disapprove. Only 44% approved.</p>
<p>And, just in case he thought it was going away, <i><a href="http://kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-april-2013/">Kaiser’s</a> </i>latest showed <b>53%</b> saying those opposed to ObamaCare should keep trying to change or stop it.</p>
<p>Then there’s this:</p>
<p>The latest from <i><a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/06/18781204-health-care-laws-unpopularity-reaches-new-highs?lite">NBC/WSJ</a></i> shows Obama’s Affordable Care Act setting new record lows as <b>49%</b> say it’s a bad idea.  “That’s the highest number since NBC/WSJ began polling about the ACA in 2009.”<sup>1</sup> Additionally, <b>38%</b> say ObamaCare will make them worse off—“the highest figure the survey has found since President Barack Obama signed the law.”<sup>1</sup> Only <b>19% </b>say it would make things better for them and their family while <b>39% </b>say it simply won’t make much difference at all.  For the record, that’s over one third of Americans who say the $1.8trillion being spent on ObamaCare won’t do a thing.</p>
<p>The up side is that it can’t get much worse, right?  Wrong.  We’re still months away from full implementation of the law and months “before the public experiences firsthand the many ill effects it will impose on the nation’s health care system.”<sup>2</sup></p>
<p>All this being said, “Think ObamaCare is unpopular now? Wait until next year.”<sup> 2</sup></p>
<p><center></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>New record lows for ObamaCare as 49% say it’s a bad idea &amp; 38% say it makes them worse off <a title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/" href="http://t.co/5ey9aqEa59">nrcc.org/2013/06/11/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>— Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/344486854520885248">June 11, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></center><br />
<span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>McLaughlin &amp; Associates for YG Network</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 4/28-30/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,000 Likely 2014 General Election Voters; MoE ±3.1% @ 95% confidence interval</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i>Slide 27; <a href="http://d15o3uej81snwq.cloudfront.net/assets/National-YG-Network-Policy-5-2-13-Presentation-for-RELEASE1.pdf">http://d15o3uej81snwq.cloudfront.net/assets/National-YG-Network-Policy-5-2-13-Presentation-for-RELEASE1.pdf</a></i></span></p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>ORC International for CNN</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 4/5-7/2013; Released 4/8/13</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,012 Adults; MoE ±3.0%</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/04/08/rel4a.pdf">http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/04/08/rel4a.pdf</a></i></span></p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Kaiser Health Tracking Poll</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 4/15-20/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,203 Adults; 18±; MoE ±3.0%</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8439-T.pdf">http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8439-T.pdf</a></i></span></p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup>1 </sup><i><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/obamacare-poll-92322.html">http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/obamacare-poll-92322.html</a></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup>2</sup> <i><a href="http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/060613-659078-obamacare-ratings-will-likely-drop-further-once-it-goes-into-effect.htm">http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/060613-659078-obamacare-ratings-will-likely-drop-further-once-it-goes-into-effect.htm</a></i></span></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/">Polling Memo: An ObamaCare Recap</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/11/polling-memo-an-obamacare-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: Americans on the IRS, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/07/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/07/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=42170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>IRS Aftermath: Obama’s Woes Next week will mark one month since the scandal surrounding the IRS’ singling out of conservative political groups erupted in Washington.  Since then, week after week, hearing after hearing, the IRS and the Obama Administration have been in the hot seat, under fire from all sides, including the American people. According <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/07/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/07/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/">Polling Memo: Americans on the IRS, Part 2</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>IRS Aftermath: Obama’s Woes </b></p>
<p>Next week will mark one month since the scandal surrounding the IRS’ singling out of conservative political groups erupted in Washington.  Since then, week after week, hearing after hearing, the IRS and the Obama Administration have been in the hot seat, under fire from all sides, including the American people.</p>
<p>According to the latest from <i><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57587924/poll-most-say-irs-targeting-was-politics-driven/">CBS/NYT</a></i>, <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">68% </span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">believe the actions taken by the IRS were <i>not</i> pure at heart in seeking to adhere to tax code policy, but were <i>politically motivated</i></span>.   When asked how personally responsible Obama was for “the [IRS’] targeting conservative and Tea Party groups for additional investigations,” data from <i><a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_U.S.%20news/US-news-PDFs/13200%20May-June%20NBC-WSJ%20(6-4-13%20Release).pdf">NBC/WSJ</a></i> showed a full<b> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">62%</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> saying Obama had some degree of personal responsibility</span>.  And, to make matters worse for the President, <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_U.S.%20news/US-news-PDFs/13200%20May-June%20NBC-WSJ%20(6-4-13%20Release).pdf">55% say</a></span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> the whole situation raises doubts about “the overall honesty and integrity of the Obama Administration,</span>” including <b><a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_U.S.%20news/US-news-PDFs/13200%20May-June%20NBC-WSJ%20(6-4-13%20Release).pdf">41% who say</a></b> it raises “major doubts.”</p>
<p>To recap, that’s a majority of Americans who believe the nation’s government agency responsible for taxes is making decisions based on political preference, another majority who believe the nation’s leader is at least somewhat responsible for it and one more majority who thinks the entire scandal raises questions about the integrity of the highest, most powerful office in the land.</p>
<p>While the investigation continues and the hard facts are still to be divulged, one thing’s for sure, it isn’t going away anytime soon.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/06/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/obama-irs-part-2_small-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-42178"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-42178" alt="Obama-IRS-part-2_SMALL" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Obama-IRS-part-2_SMALL1.png" width="822" height="429" /></a></center>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Social Science Research Solutions for CBS/NYT</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/31-6/4/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,022 Adults; MoE ±3.0% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57587924/poll-most-say-irs-targeting-was-politics-driven/">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57587924/poll-most-say-irs-targeting-was-politics-driven/</a></i></span></p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Hart/McInturff for NBC/WSJ</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/30-6/2/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,000 Adults; MoE ±3.0% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_U.S.%20news/US-news-PDFs/13200%20May-June%20NBC-WSJ%20(6-4-13%20Release).pdf">http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_U.S.%20news/US-news-PDFs/13200%20May-June%20NBC-WSJ%20(6-4-13%20Release).pdf</a></i><i></i></span></p>
<p><center><br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p>55% think IRS scandal raises doubts about the overall integrity of the Obama Administration <a href="http://t.co/ndmQuImo4D" title="http://goo.gl/pu25t">goo.gl/pu25t</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/343006042147401729">June 7, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></center></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/07/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/">Polling Memo: Americans on the IRS, Part 2</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/07/polling-memo-americans-on-the-irs-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: Is ObamaCare Forcing Democrats on Defense?</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=41971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Living Under ObamaCare: From Blue to Red, Most don’t want to… It has now been 1,168 days since the President’s Affordable Care Act known as ObamaCare became law.  Back then, a majority opposed the law.  Today, little has changed as 54% still oppose ObamaCare.  This includes 52% of women, 56% of men, 65% of seniors, <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/">Polling Memo: Is ObamaCare Forcing Democrats on Defense?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Living Under ObamaCare: From Blue to Red, Most don’t want to…</b></p>
<p>It has now been 1,168 days since the President’s Affordable Care Act known as ObamaCare became law.  Back then, a majority opposed the law.  Today, little has changed as <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/28/healthcarepoll.pdf">54% <i>still</i> oppose</a></span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> ObamaCare</span>.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">This includes <b>52%</b> of women, <b>56%</b> of men, <b>65%</b> of seniors, <b>60%</b> of Independents and <b>50%</b> of moderates</span>.  In fact, this is the worst rating for the President’s healthcare law since November 2011. Ouch.</p>
<p>It should come as no surprise then, scarred by the healthcare induced wave of 2010, House Democrats are feeling a little uneasy about the possibility of another ObamaCare war in 2014, and rightfully so.</p>
<p>In <b>IL-10</b>, a <i>D+8</i>, <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/dems-2014-strategy-own-obamacare-92172_Page2.html">57% say</a></span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> the implementation of ObamaCare should be stopped or delayed</span>.  Likewise, in <b>UT-4</b>, an <i>R+14</i>, another <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/dems-2014-strategy-own-obamacare-92172_Page2.html">72% want</a></span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> implementation stopped or delayed</span>.  The problem?  Both Congressman Brad Schneider of Illinois and Congressman Jim Matheson of Utah voted to keep ObamaCare.<b> </b></p>
<p>If Democrats are to take back the house in 2014, they’re going to have to do so being on the offensive and winning in some red states.  With ObamaCare looming in the background, it looks a lot more like defense for House Democrats.<b></b></p>
<p><center><i> <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/obamacare-ut-and-il-small-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-41979"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-41979" alt="Obamacare-UT-and-IL-Small 2" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Obamacare-UT-and-IL-Small-2.png" width="627" height="639" /></a></i></center><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>ORC International for CNN</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/17-18/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 923 Adults; MoE ±3.0% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/28/healthcarepoll.pdf">http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/28/healthcarepoll.pdf</a></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><i> </i><i>Additional Numbers: <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/dems-2014-strategy-own-obamacare-92172_Page2.html">http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/dems-2014-strategy-own-obamacare-92172_Page2.html</a></i></span></p>
<p><center></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Is ObamaCare forcing Democrats on Defense? Numbers say yes.<a title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/" href="http://t.co/9bwLsrEw3u">nrcc.org/2013/06/05/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23gop">#gop</a></p>
<p>— Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/342298212155129857">June 5, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></center></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/">Polling Memo: Is ObamaCare Forcing Democrats on Defense?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/05/polling-memo-is-obamacare-for-democrats-on-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: Are Scandals Moving Independents?</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=41746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama &#38; Independents: Tanking Two weeks ago, in the midst of brewing scandals, questions remained about the impact on President Obama as some initial polls showed his approval ratings virtually unchanged. Today, however, headlines are telling a very different story as new numbers show the “scandals [hammering] Obama’s approval ratings.” And, where is he hurting <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/">Polling Memo: Are Scandals Moving Independents?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Obama &amp; Independents: Tanking</b></p>
<p>Two weeks ago, in the midst of brewing scandals, questions remained about the impact on President Obama as some initial polls showed his approval ratings virtually unchanged.</p>
<p>Today, however, headlines are telling a very different story as new numbers show the “<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/30/scandals-hammer-obamas-approval-ratings/">scandals [hammering] Obama’s approval ratings.</a>” And, where is he hurting the most? Independents.</p>
<p>Here are the numbers:</p>
<p>According to new data from <i><a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us05302013.pdf/">Quinnipiac</a></i>, <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">57%</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> of Independents <i>disapprove</i> of the way Obama is handling his job as President</span>.  Only <b>37 % </b>approve.  That’s a <b>20 point </b>negative spread.  When it comes to favorability, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">President Obama sits net negative among Independents <b>42-56 unfavorable</b></span>.  The last time Quinnipiac asked this question, Obama sat barely underwater at 46-49 among Independents.  That’s an <b>11 point </b>swing against the President since <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02082013.pdf/">February</a>.</p>
<p>When it comes to character traits, <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">56-40</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">, Independents say the President is  <b>NOT</b> honest and trustworthy</span>, followed by another <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">51%</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> who say Obama does <b>NOT </b> “[care] about the needs and problems of people like [them]</span>.”</p>
<p>Turning to Benghazi and the IRS, <b>53-34</b>, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Independents believe the Obama Administration <i>deliberately misled</i> the American people about Benghazi</span>.  Likewise, <b>47-39</b>, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Independents also believe the President <i>intentionally mislead</i> Americans about the situation with the IRS</span>.<i></i></p>
<p>Looks like the Administration’s slew of scandals are finally catching up with President Obama.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/obama-independents-and-scandals-small/" rel="attachment wp-att-41751"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-41751" alt="Obama-Independents-and-Scandals SMALL" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Obama-Independents-and-Scandals-SMALL.png" width="803" height="475" /></a></center>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Quinnipiac University</i><i></i><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/22-28/2013</i><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,419 LVs; MoE ±2.6% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us05302013.pdf/">http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us05302013.pdf/</a></i></span></p>
<p><center><br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p>Administration’s slew of scandals has President Obama tanking with Independents. <a href="http://t.co/YFQ1gzJoV0" title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/">nrcc.org/2013/06/03/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/341587163881828352">June 3, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></center></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/">Polling Memo: Are Scandals Moving Independents?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/06/03/polling-memo-are-scandals-moving-independents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: The Numbers Behind the IRS</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=41446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post: Americans on the IRS Nearly three weeks ago, while the Obama Administration was already treading water over Benghazi, a new scandal erupted when Lois Lerner, director of Exempt Organizations for the IRS, acknowledged the “IRS had improperly scrutinized conservative groups.”1  Since then, the Obama Administration has incessantly denied any involvement in the scandal.  <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/">Polling Memo: The Numbers Behind the IRS</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Washington Post: Americans on the IRS</b></p>
<p>Nearly three weeks ago, while the Obama Administration was already treading water over Benghazi, a new scandal erupted when Lois Lerner, director of Exempt Organizations for the IRS, acknowledged the “IRS had improperly scrutinized conservative groups.”<span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup>1</sup></span>  Since then, the Obama Administration has incessantly denied any involvement in the scandal.  In fact, in a joint press conference the President stated, “[he] first learned about it through the same news reports other people learned from.”<span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup>2</sup></span></p>
<p>The big question is—<b>are Americans buying it</b>?  The numbers would suggest they aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Data from last week’s <i><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/polling/may-2013-postabc-poll/2013/05/23/16a98012-c1cb-11e2-9aa6-fc21ae807a8a_page.html">Washington Post</a></i> poll showed nearly <b>three-fours</b> <b>(74%) </b>of Americans believing the actions took by the IRS in intentionally targeting conservative groups was <i>inappropriate</i>.  Of that <b>74 percent</b>, <b>51% </b>said not only was it inappropriate, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">but it was <b>illegal</b></span>.  Respondents were then asked whether this “extra focus” on conservative groups was a “deliberate effort to harass these groups” or an “administrative mistake.”  <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fifty-six percent</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> said it was deliberate, including <b>59% </b>of <b>Independents</b></span>.  Lastly, while they are relatively split, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">by a </span><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">45%-42%</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> margin Americans believe the Obama Administration is trying to cover up the facts</span>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/obama-irs_small/" rel="attachment wp-att-41455"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-41455" alt="Obama-IRS_SMALL" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Obama-IRS_SMALL.png" width="725" height="517" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Abt-SRBI for Washington Post</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/16-19/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,001 Adults; MoE ±3.5% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/polling/may-2013-postabc-poll/2013/05/23/16a98012-c1cb-11e2-9aa6-fc21ae807a8a_page.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/polling/may-2013-postabc-poll/2013/05/23/16a98012-c1cb-11e2-9aa6-fc21ae807a8a_page.html</a></i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup><span style="font-size: 10pt;">1 </span></sup><i><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/irs-investigation-timeline-who-knew-when/">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/irs-investigation-timeline-who-knew-when/</a></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup><span style="font-size: 10pt;">2 </span></sup><i><a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/05/13/obama-on-irs-scandal-ive-got-no-patience-with-it-n1593814">http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/05/13/obama-on-irs-scandal-ive-got-no-patience-with-it-n1593814</a></i></span></p>
<p><center><br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p>56% say IRS actions were deliberate, 51% say they’re illegal &amp; 45% say Administration is trying to cover it up <a href="http://t.co/95B8OgMjGr" title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/">nrcc.org/2013/05/29/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/339775897408262144">May 29, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></center></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/">Polling Memo: The Numbers Behind the IRS</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/29/polling-memo-the-numbers-behind-the-irs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: The Truth about that Generic Ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=41211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post, Round 2: About That Generic Ballot Today’s headline from The Hill touts an eight point lead for Democrats on the generic ballot for Congress according to Tuesday’s Washington Post poll. A few things about that. One: As pointed out yesterday, Washington Post has the partisan spread pegged at 33 % Democrat and 22% <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/">Polling Memo: The Truth about that Generic Ballot</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Washington Post, Round 2: About That Generic Ballot</b></p>
<p>Today’s headline from <i><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/house-races/301525-poll-dems-lead-by-8-on-house-ballot#ixzz2U7jVtgCd">The Hill</a></i> touts an eight point lead for Democrats on the generic ballot for Congress according to Tuesday’s <i><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/05/23/National-Politics/Polling/question_11079.xml?uuid=Ns8xOMOYEeKWQqVhd_HN9w">Washington Post</a> </i>poll.</p>
<p>A few things about that.</p>
<p><b>One:</b></p>
<p>As pointed out yesterday, <i><a href="http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-may-15-19-2013/170/">Washington Post</a></i> has the partisan spread pegged at <b>33 % Democrat and 22% Republican</b>.  Democrats do not have an <b>11 point</b> registration advantage.  Period.</p>
<p>Once again, for reference, on Election Night 2012, Democrats composed <b>38%</b> of the electorate and Republicans composed <b>32.</b>  That’s a <b>6 point spread</b>.  In the 2008 wave election, Democrats <i>still </i>only had a <b>7 point </b>turnout<b> </b>advantage over Republicans, <b>39-32</b> respectively.</p>
<p><b>Two</b>:</p>
<p>Notice the position of the generic congressional ballot.  Normally, this particular question is placed at the beginning of a survey to gage voter’s instinctive attitudes prior to message testing and the like. It’s the best way to get an unbiased response.</p>
<p>Here, <a href="http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-may-15-19-2013/170/"><i>Washington Post</i></a> places it <span style="text-decoration: underline;">three questions before the survey ends, right before asking about the Tea Party and <b><i>after</i></b> respondents are prompted to contemplate who’s to blame for the Senate not passing background checks, President Obama or Republicans</span>. By focusing on issues first, you’re framing the way in which a voter considers the ballot, and that’s called loading the deck.</p>
<p><b>Three:</b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/generic_congressional_vote-2170.html">Real Clear Politics</a><b> </b></i>has the generic ballot averaged at <b>42-40</b> with Democrats up <b>2 percent.</b>  That’s a much more accurate read of where the ballot normally is and where it likely is today.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/wapo-generic_small/" rel="attachment wp-att-41214"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-41214" alt="WaPo-Generic_Small" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/WaPo-Generic_Small.png" width="773" height="516" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Abt-SRBI for Washington Post</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/16-19/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,001 Adults; MoE ±3.5% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><em><a href="http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-may-15-19-2013/170/">http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-may-15-19-2013/170/</a></em><i></i></span></p>
<p><center><br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p>The truth behind Washington Post’s generic congressional ballot. <a href="http://t.co/1A9oNSFtBm" title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/">nrcc.org/2013/05/23/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23gop">#gop</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/337600346786496513">May 23, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></center></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/">Polling Memo: The Truth about that Generic Ballot</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/23/polling-memo-the-truth-about-that-generic-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: The Real Numbers behind Obama&#8217;s Approval Ratings</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=41098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>About Those Obama Ratings: The Facts Recent headlines have boasted “steady” job approval ratings for President Obama despite last week’s brewing round of scandals. What those headlines haven’t told you are the real reasons behind those numbers.  Let’s take a look. First, Washington Post.  Yesterday, Washington Post showed Obama sitting plus 7 at 51-44 percent <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/">Polling Memo: The Real Numbers behind Obama&#8217;s Approval Ratings</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>About Those Obama Ratings: The Facts</b></p>
<p>Recent headlines have boasted “<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-rating-steady-amid-controversies-likely-buoyed-by-rising-economic-hopes/2013/05/20/5509c03e-c17f-11e2-bfdb-3886a561c1ff_story.html?wpisrc=nl_pmpol">steady</a>” job approval ratings for President Obama despite last week’s brewing round of scandals.</p>
<p>What those headlines haven’t told you are the real reasons behind those numbers.  Let’s take a look.</p>
<p><b>First, Washington Post.  </b></p>
<p>Yesterday, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/05/21/National-Politics/Polling/release_237.xml"><i>Washington Post</i></a> showed Obama sitting <b>plus 7 </b>at <b>51-44 percent </b>on his job approval as President of the United States.  When looking at the sample frame, it also showed an <b>11 point advantage for Democrats</b> on party ID—<b>33% Democrat and 22% Republican.</b>   For reference, on Election Night 2012, Democrats composed <b>38%</b> of the electorate and Republicans composed <b>32%.</b>  That’s a <b>6 point spread</b>.  Furthermore, in 2008, when Democrats won in a landslide, Democrats <i>still </i>only had a <b>7 point </b>turnout<b> </b>advantage over Republicans, <b>39-32</b> respectively.</p>
<p><b>Next,</b> <b>CNN.</b> <i></i></p>
<p>On Sunday, <a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf"><i>CNN</i></a> released data showing President Obama sitting at a more than comfortable <b>+8 percent</b> <b>(53-45)</b> on his job approval.  Not only is this a <b>4 point</b> <b>net positive movement</b> for Obama since their <a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/04/08/rel4a.pdf">last survey in April</a> where he sat at 51-47 approve, but it’s also a 4 point swing in favor of the President in his supposed “<a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-17/opinions/39329063_1_president-obama-worst-week-benghazi">worst week ever</a>.”  Why?  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The men and Independent samples are just too democratic</span>.</p>
<p>In this poll, men approve of the President <b>50-49</b>. In April, they disapproved <b>45-52</b>. On Election Night 2012, they voted <b><i>against</i></b> President Obama <b>45-52</b>.</p>
<p>Turning to Independents, this poll has Independents disapproving of Obama <b>47-49</b>. In April, they disapproved <b>45-52</b>. On Election Night 2012, Independents went for Romney <b>50-45</b>.</p>
<p>What’s crazy is the fact that these polls <i>still</i> show numbers like this: “<b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">60 percent of independent</span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> voters think the Obama administration is ‘trying to cover up the facts’ about what occurred in Benghazi, while <b>47 percent</b> think the administration is scrambling to cover up the IRS scandal</span>.’”<sup> 1 </sup></p>
<p>Imagine what the numbers would be if the samples were <i>actually</i> correct.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/cnn-and-wapo-busted-small/" rel="attachment wp-att-41099"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-41099" alt="CNN-and-WaPo-Busted Small" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CNN-and-WaPo-Busted-Small.png" width="843" height="561" /></a></center>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Abt-SRBI for Washington Post</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/16-19/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,001 Adults; MoE ±3.5% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/05/21/National-Politics/Polling/release_237.xml">http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/05/21/National-Politics/Polling/release_237.xml</a></i></span></p>
<p><b></b><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>ORC International for CNN</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/14-18/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 923 Adults; MoE ±3.0% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf"><i>http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf</i></a><i></i></span></p>
<p><i></i><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>ORC International for CNN</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 4/5-7/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,012 Adults; MoE ±3.0% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/04/08/rel4a.pdf">http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/04/08/rel4a.pdf</a></i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><i> </i><i><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><sup>1 </sup></span></i><i><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/348913/poll-independents-think-obama-administration-involved-cover-benghazi-irs-katrina">http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/348913/poll-independents-think-obama-administration-involved-cover-benghazi-irs-katrina</a></i></span></p>
<p></center><br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p>The real numbers behind the President’s “steady” approval ratings. Take a look here: <a href="http://t.co/Dpfug8SU0f" title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/">nrcc.org/2013/05/22/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23gop">#gop</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/337240573608079360">May 22, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><center></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/">Polling Memo: The Real Numbers behind Obama&#8217;s Approval Ratings</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/22/polling-memo-the-real-numbers-behind-obamas-approval-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: Voters on Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=41027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Benghazi: By the Numbers A little over eight months ago, on September 11, 2012, terrorists attacked the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya killing four Americans including Ambassador Chris Stevens. Since then, the Obama administration has been anything but transparent in the Benghazi investigation, constantly changing the narrative as to what was known and when.  <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/">Polling Memo: Voters on Benghazi</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>Benghazi: By the Numbers</b></p>
<p>A little over eight months ago, on September 11, 2012, terrorists attacked the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya killing four Americans including Ambassador Chris Stevens.</p>
<p>Since then, the Obama administration has been <i>anything but transparent</i> in the Benghazi investigation, constantly changing the narrative as to what was known and when.  And, while President Obama continues to dismiss these troubling findings as nothing more than “<a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/13/18232152-obama-dismisses-benghazi-talking-points-controversy-as-a-sideshow?lite">political circus</a>,” here’s where the voters stand.</p>
<p><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf">Fifty-three percent</a></span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> are dissatisfied with the “way the Obama administration has handled [Benghazi] in the past few months.</span>” Among <b>Independents</b>, this numbers jumps to <b>58 percent</b>. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf">Another <b>59 percent</b></a> believe the attacks were <i>preventable</i></span>. <b>Fifty-eight percent </b>of<b> Independents</b> agree.  And, while the electorate is relatively split when it comes to whether the Obama Administration has been honest on Benghazi, <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/05/13/benghazi-investigation-does-not-reignite-broad-public-interest/">48 percent of Independents</a></span></b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> are convinced they have been <i>dishonest</i></span>.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/benghazi-small/" rel="attachment wp-att-41028"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-41028" alt="Benghazi Small" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Benghazi-Small.png" width="778" height="465" /></a></center>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>ORC International for CNN</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/14-18/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 923 Adults; MoE ±3.0% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i>Q 18 &amp; 21</i><i>; </i><i><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf">http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/19/rel6a.pdf</a></i><i></i></span></p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>Pew Research Center</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 5/9-12/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,000 Adults; MoE ±3.7% </i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i><a href="http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/5-13-13%20Benghazi%20Release.pdf">http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/5-13-13%20Benghazi%20Release.pdf</a></i><i></i></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Numbers show Obama in tough spot among IND as 48% believe Administration has been dishonest on <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23Benghazi">#Benghazi</a>. <a title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/" href="http://t.co/ZVbMd2V4RS">nrcc.org/2013/05/20/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>— Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/336548578019397632">May 20, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/">Polling Memo: Voters on Benghazi</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/20/polling-memo-voters-on-benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Memo: The ObamaCare Train Wreck</title>
		<link>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kayla Sulzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling Memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrcc.org/?p=40860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>YG Network: No Hope 4 ObamaCare About a month ago, top democrat and key proponent of the President’s healthcare bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told radio host Rusty Humphries that ObamaCare is headed for a huge “train wreck.” Voters would seemingly agree as a 44 percent plurality believes ObamaCare will make things worse for <a class="moretag" href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/">...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/">Polling Memo: The ObamaCare Train Wreck</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>YG Network: No Hope 4 ObamaCare</b></p>
<p>About a month ago, top democrat and key proponent of the President’s healthcare bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told radio host Rusty Humphries that ObamaCare is headed for a huge “train wreck.”</p>
<p>Voters would seemingly agree as a <b><a href="http://ygnetwork.org/downloads/National_YGN_Vision_3-13-13_Presentation.PDF">44 percent</a> </b>plurality believes ObamaCare <span style="text-decoration: underline;">will make things worse for them and their family</span>.  When looking at <b>Independents</b>, this number spikes to a near majority at <b><a href="http://ygnetwork.org/downloads/National_YGN_Vision_3-13-13_Presentation.PDF">48 percent</a></b>. Additionally, <b><a href="http://ygnetwork.org/downloads/National_YGN_Vision_3-13-13_Presentation.PDF">53% of voters say</a> they would repeal or change ObamaCare.</b></p>
<p>Despite clear voter discontent with the healthcare law, <b>once again</b>, House Democrats, voted <i>against repeal</i> of the President’s Affordable Care Act.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/obamacare-trainwreck_small/" rel="attachment wp-att-40879"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-40879" alt="Obamacare-Trainwreck_Small" src="http://www.nrcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Obamacare-Trainwreck_Small.png" width="799" height="463" /></a></center>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>POLLSTER:</b> <i>McLaughlin &amp; Associates for YG Network</i><i></i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>DATE: </b><i>Conducted 3/4-7/2013</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SAMPLE:</b> <i>Sampled 1,000 Likely 2014 General Election Voters; MoE ±3.1% @ 95% confidence interval</i></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>SOURCE: </b><i>Slide 20 &amp; 24; <a href="http://ygnetwork.org/downloads/National_YGN_Vision_3-13-13_Presentation.PDF">http://ygnetwork.org/downloads/National_YGN_Vision_3-13-13_Presentation.PDF</a></i></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>While 44% say ObamaCare will makes things worse, House Dems once again vote for the ObamaCare “train wreck” <a title="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/" href="http://t.co/ar5zeQPjtP">nrcc.org/2013/05/16/pol…</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23tcot">#tcot</a></p>
<p>— Topline Translator (@ToplineReport) <a href="https://twitter.com/ToplineReport/status/335160556208148480">May 16, 2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/">Polling Memo: The ObamaCare Train Wreck</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.nrcc.org">National Republican Congressional Committee</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrcc.org/2013/05/16/polling-memo-the-obamacare-train-wreck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 24/55 queries in 0.136 seconds using disk
Object Caching 4409/4487 objects using disk

 Served from: www.nrcc.org @ 2013-06-15 20:47:26 by W3 Total Cache --