ICYMI: Washington Post: Hillary Clinton’s email story continues to get harder and harder to believe

June 28, 2016

hillary nev

Talk about bad timing! Just a week after House Democrats fully embraced FBI target Hillary Clinton’s scandal plagued candidacy with a big money Washington fundraiser, new evidence has come to light undermining Hillary Clinton’s version of events pertaining to her private email server.

165 new pages of emails were released by court order yesterday. These emails, though clearly work-related, were not among those Clinton turned over to the State Department from her private server. Where did these emails come from? The Washington Post reminds us:

“Remember that Clinton and a small group of people working for her reviewed all of the emails she sent from her private server and made the decision what was solely personal and what was work-related. She handed over the work-related email and permanently deleted those that she and her team decided were purely personal.  She wound up deleting more emails than she turned over to State.”

To make things even worse for Clinton, the newly found emails further undermine her story that the private email server was set up purely for the purpose of convenience, as one email from Clinton instructed her aide, Huma Abedin, that, “…we need to get on this asap to be sure we know and design the system we want.” This email is a smoking gun showing that Clinton’s real purpose in creating her private email server was to manage which records would eventually be available to the public and which would remain hidden.

NRCC Comment: “As the constant drip of details regarding FBI target Hillary Clinton’s email scandal continues, it has become clear that Clinton set up her private email server as part of an effort to hide her records from the public eye. House Democrats will have to explain to voters why they are supporting a candidate who clearly believes the law does not apply to her.” – NRCC Spokesman Bob Salera

 

Hillary Clinton’s email story continues to get harder and harder to believe

Washington Post – The Fix

Chris Cillizza

June 28, 2016

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/28/hillary-clintons-email-story-continues-to-get-harder-and-harder-to-believe/?postshare=5461467129154416&tid=ss_tw

On Monday night, the Associated Press published a piece noting the release of an additional 165 pages of emails Hillary Clinton sent from her private email address while serving as Secretary of State. These were emails that had never been previously released and only were made public due to a court order in response to a request from a conservative group.

And, yet again, the emails poke holes in Clinton’s initial explanation for why she decided to exclusively use a private email server for her electronic correspondence while serving as the nation’s top diplomat.

Let’s start with this from the AP story: “The emails were not among the 55,000 pages of work-related messages that Clinton turned over to the agency in response to public records lawsuits seeking copies of her official correspondence.”

Remember that Clinton and a small group of people working for her reviewed all of the emails she sent from her private server and made the decision what was solely personal and what was work-related. She handed over the work-related email and permanently deleted those that she and her team decided were purely personal.  She wound up deleting more emails than she turned over to State.

The latest batch of emails suggest that Clinton’s filter to decide between the personal and the professional was far from full-proof. That these emails never saw the light of day before Monday — or before a conservative legal advocacy group petitioned for their release — opens up the possibility that there are plenty more like them that Clinton chose to delete but shouldn’t have. And it provides more fodder for the Republican argument that Clinton appointing herself as judge, jury and executioner for her emails was, at best, a very, very bad decision and, at worst, something more nefarious than just bad judgement.

Then there’s this quote from a newly-released March 2009 email between Clinton and her top aide Huma Abedin about the email setup: “I have just realized I have no idea how my papers are treated at State. Who manages both my personal and official files? … I think we need to get on this asap to be sure we know and design the system we want.”

Hmmm.

Remember that Clinton said that her main/only reason for using a private email server while at State was “convenience.” She didn’t want to carry around multiple devices for email, she explained.

But, this email to Abedin — which came at the start of her four year term in office — suggests a bit more active agency than Clinton has previously let on. “I think we need to get on this asap to be sure we know and design the system we want,” doesn’t strike me as Clinton simply wanting convenience and following the instructions of her IT people on how to make that happen. It reads to me as though Clinton is both far more aware of the email setup and far more engaged in how it should look than she generally lets on publicly.

There’s nothing in these emails that changes the basic political dynamic of the email controversy as Clinton seeks to win the White House this fall. Everything, still, depends on whether the Justice Department decides to indict Clinton or those close to her for purposely keeping information that the public had a right to know away from them. We’ve been waiting on the results of that FBI investigation for months now and, in truth, no one really knows when they will finally come.

But, revelations like Monday’s — a chunk of previously undisclosed emails that are clearly professional in nature — lend further doubt to the story Clinton had told about why she set up a private server and how she handled it after leaving office. For a candidate already struggling to convince voters she is honest and trustworthy enough to be president, stories like this one are deeply problematic.